Financial Coup d'Etat

I found this interesting article 'A Financial Coup d'Etat'. It is a fascinating read, and exposes much of the boom of the past twenty five years or so as a money grab by elite banks and other financial institutions and their greedy bosses.

It seems that privatisation was actually a way for them to get discounted public utilities, and then sell them on for a profit, at our expense!

Well, I can't say much surprises me anymore, almost everything I once thought I knew has been exposed as lies! I feel a fool, and to think the lefties were actually right about something? All that talk about big business and fat cats and insider dealing and governments in bed with big business and the evils of globalisation, all the things I thought were actually good for us, were in fact wrong, and not only wrong, but in essence they were Satanic!

They have been bankrupting us for decades, they have been lying to us and syphoning our money away so that they can live lives of luxury on stolen goods, things that once belonged to us!

The opening paragraph states,

'In the fall of 2001 I attended a private investment conference in London to give a paper, The Myth of the Rule of Law or How the Money Works: The Destruction of Hamilton Securities Group.

The presentation documented my experience with a Washington-Wall Street partnership that had:

• Engineered a fraudulent housing and debt bubble;
• Illegally shifted vast amounts of capital out of the U.S.;
• Used “privitization” as form or piracy - a pretext to move government assets to private investors at below-market prices and then shift private liabilities back to government at no cost to the private liability holder.

Other presenters at the conference included distinguished reporters covering privatization in Eastern Europe and Russia. As the portraits of British ancestors stared down upon us, we listened to story after story of global privatization throughout the 1990s in the Americas, Europe, and Asia.

Slowly, as the pieces fit together, we shared a horrifying epiphany: the banks, corporations and investors acting in each global region were the exact same players. They were a relatively small group that reappeared again and again in Russia, Eastern Europe, and Asia accompanied by the same well-known accounting firms and law firms.

Clearly, there was a global financial coup d’etat underway.'

The only way these thieves will be stopped, is with violence, not something I personally support, although in my darker moments I admit I do fantasise about violent things happening to the scum that rule us, but it is inevitable that someone is going to have a 'Falling Down' moment, somewhere at some point, of all the millions who have lost everything, or the millions more who are about to lose everything, there must be one man who is on the edge, whose 'Falling Down' moment could be the spark that lights this petrol soaked house that is the 'Way Things Are'.

God help us all!

Newborn baby thrown out with the trash alive!

'A young mother has accused a Florida clinic of botching her abortion, allowing her child to be born alive - then putting the baby into a plastic bag and throwing her out with the trash.

Sycloria Williams is suing Dr Pierre Jean-Jacque Renelique and the abortion clinic's owners in a case that has shocked both sides of the abortion debate.

Aged 18, Ms Williams went to an abortion clinic outside Miami and paid $1,200 for Dr Renelique to terminate her 23-week pregnancy.

Three days later, she sat in a reclining chair, medicated and ready for the procedure.

But Dr Renelique did not arrive in time - and, according to Williams and the Florida Department of Health, she went into labour and delivered a live baby girl.

Then, Ms Williams and the Department of Health claim, one of the clinic's owners - who has no medical licence - cut the infant's umbilical cord.

Ms Williams says the woman placed the baby in a plastic bio-hazard bag and threw it out.

Police recovered the decomposing remains in a cardboard box a week later after getting anonymous tips.

An autopsy revealed air in the baby girl's lungs - proving that she was born alive and breathing.'

There is so much about this that is so wrong, I don't know where to start!

Source

Debt as Money

The following video explain money, and how it comes to be. I used to wonder at those admonitions not to accept or commit usury in Scripture, it seemed a bit odd and out of date, 'old fashioned' if you will. How wrong I was!

Over the past year or so, I have learned quite a bit about money and debt, but this is the most concise and clear explanation so far.




It is well worth the 45 minutes!

Who are we?

We are orphans, subjects of wicked men who claim they 'care' for us, we are lost, walking in the darkness, in the ruins of what was once a glorious civilisation. We are a people lost in our dreams, hoping one day, we can awake to a reality much like our dreams.

But our waking lives are a nightmare, we struggle to survive, despised by our rulers, loathed by the elite, who seek our dissolution, they sponsor a wave of human migration, the likes the world has never seen, they sponsor violence against us and ours.

We are told we are evil and wicked, we are mocked, or fathers are condemned as wicked, by those who rule us with a rod, a rod of fear, of threatened violence.

We are a people separated from our past, from our forefathers, from the glories of Europe before the great slaughter of the First World War, the suicide of the west.

We are peoples wandering, without roots, without hope, drenched in grief and mourning for this lost world. Most of us can't explain why we feel this way, most find it difficult to express our loss, our grief.

We hear this grief in our music, we sense it all around us, but cant define it.

The world has been through many terrible griefs, we have seen many terrible things, we have toiled and bled, we have fought and many have died, many of those who have died, died in vain, but nothing can compare to the fratricide unleashed in 1914.

In those terrible years we were marked, like Cain, we are cursed.

We seek a saviour, a messiah, and all to many times we have sought solace in false Messiahs, Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, De Gaulle, Thatcher, Blair and now Obama, at other times we have sought saviours in 'democracy', 'human rights' and in discarding our past, our faith and morality, what fools we are, what desperation we must feel.

And yet, we still have our dreams, as weak as they are, as demoralised as we are, there is still a spark of goodness there, a point of light, a hope.

This hope is not in politics, it is not in arguing with our enemies, it is not in letter writing or pointless protests, it is not in powerless 'constitutional monarchies', it is in our souls, in our spirits, our peoples, the men of the west.

We are weak, many of us still believe vainly in 'democracy', but if we can get past this, just a small minority can change things, how many men were involved in instigating the French Revolution? Or the Russian Revolution? Not many, a few thousand at most, they led, they seized power from weakened governments, they did not campaign for election, they took power, not that I like the Jacobins or Bolsheviks in any way, I despise them and their works. But we must take lessons from their exploits, if we are ever to be serious, we need to discard our antique and unthinking belief in 'democracy' or voting or trying to convince the majority, the majority will always just go along with the way things are, we must think the unthinkable!

We are a lost people, a rudderless sham of a civilisation, if we don't do something serious soon, even that shadow of what we once were will be gone.

It's time for a counterrevolution.

A Brief History of Finance

The following is an excellent post describing the most natural revolutionaries, the bankers, the ones who seem to have molded the world around them to benefit them and their balance sheet, it is a long read, but quite instructive!

Taken from Bedlam Nation

'Centuries ago, international bankers found that by financing governments who wished to make war on each other they could maintain control over them, ensure favorable business conditions and pile up enormous wealth. If they were displeased by the performance of the leaders they installed, they could finance the opposition. The international bankers want open population flows because they think of people as interchangeable parts. As long as the populace is not in a position to make trouble and are able to buy the products and services marketed to them, the financiers are satisfied.

America’s “robber barons” of the 19th century followed the same basic formula. Most of them were young men during the Civil War, which they bought their way out of. Some, like Jay Cooke, were aligned with the bankers and acted as agents in the war's financing. Others, like Rockefeller, Gould, Armour, Carnegie and many more, sought to develop the industries that would enable the country to be brought under a single hegemonic rule.

Steel, railroads and oil would unite all markets into one. The federal government dished out massive acreage for railroad use. Elected officials of both national and local scale were amenable to these schemes. Small localities could be turned overnight into boomtowns or ruined instantly by the mere location of the railroad tracks. Municipal officials were compelled by the railroad magnates to provide the financing for each section of track and other infrastructure. The railroads brought with them the possibility of huge economic benefits.

Business, trade, population and housing all boomed. The town fathers who were in on the ground floor stood to reap gigantic wealth. The Indians were wiped out, the free rangers were fenced in, the freebooters, gamblers and other unruly elements were brought under control and the territories made safe for the farmers and settlers who provided the necessary population. Eventually these places sought statehood and were brought into the federal system.

One thing about the robber barons, especially Rockefeller, that has generally escaped the notice of the popular imagination is that they hated competition. Having a lot of small operators all competing against each other in a single industry – the Adam Smith model – is messy and hampers the growth of the huge economies of scale that allowed the magnates to mass enormous wealth and power. The hype surrounding Progressive-era politics was that men like Theodore Roosevelt broke up the trusts in the interests of the little guy.

But the truth is big business became bigger than ever. As the century turned, these original magnates, whose goals and methods made them natural allies with the international bankers, faced two problems. One, an increasing need to standardize both markets and labor force; and two, to shield their wealth from the new tax laws that were coming in to buy off the threat of socialist unrest. They hit upon two solutions.

One, a public education system that would ensure a citizenry that was thoroughly indoctrinated in the right attitudes to function as both docile workers and reliable consumers. And two, a central bank, under their control, that would ensure both the bankers’ control over government in perpetuity and also enable them to manipulate credit and the money supply to keep the peasantry sufficiently able to buy the gewgaws of the ever-growing commercial sector to keep them satisfied with their serfdom, forever. The tax-exempt foundation and the Federal Reserve would enable them to accomplish these goals.

In 1953, the Reece Commission investigated the money links between the tax-exempt foundations and the socialistic elements in the educational system. The picture that emerged was one of the vast wealth of the monopoly capitalists, shielded from taxation, being used to promulgate grossly socialistic schemes. Why would capitalists fund institutions that preached the expropriation of the rich? Because they really had nothing to fear from these people, and they knew it. Once a socialist movement reached ascendancy in a country and formed a government, its leaders would need financing and would have to come to the bankers to get it. The money would come with strings attached, and once again the elements of high finance would be in control. People would have before them just the options provided them by the money power, and no more.

After World War II, the major opinion-forming bodies – the interlocking heads of the foundations and the education theorists in charge of disseminating their dictates – decided that what was needed was a “one-world citizen.” All of these cooperating branches of the propaganda machine championed the notions of freedom, democracy and international brotherhood. The media was expanded from its roots in American newspapers as the herald of commercial advertisers to a force for change in the directions dictated by the internationalists.

Newspapers, movies, radio, television and the music industry began to hammer home relentlessly the new themes: the innate goodness and deserving nature of long-suffering blacks; the need for equal rights for blacks and women; tolerance of sex and lifestyle freedoms; the virtue, frankness, openness and general goodness of the common man of mass democracy; that the world’s people were really just Americans at heart and deserved a chance to prosper and therefore should be admitted into the country at once, all of them; and the need for the churches to stop trying to bring man into redemption from sinfulness through Christ and instead to enforce love and tolerance of his fellows, which will be distorted in practical terms to mean the acceptance of ever more outrageous and vile conduct in thought and deed as normal, healthy and benevolent.

Most people remain basically unalarmed by all of this. On the one hand you have the minorities, who agree with most of these tendencies; their only reservation is that they are not being implemented fast enough. Their spokesmen and their white allies complain constantly that racism, sexism and homophobia are more pervasive than ever. On the other hand the rank and file white people are cowed into submission by the relentless brainwashing of the media. It’s just not nice to notice that most of the crime is committed by blacks and mestizos, and that wherever middle-class American culture is being debased and disparaging media images of whites abound, Jews and their anti-Christ secular allies are pulling the strings.

Working against white solidarity in the face of minority onslaught and demographic subsumation by mass immigration is that most whites simply don’t think they are vulnerable. As long as the money machine keeps working, and the system of imperial control of the world’s labor and vital resources keeps the cheap goods flowing, well, everything is all right. Another problem is that not all whites think of themselves as “white.” This goes back almost fifteen hundred years to the struggles between the Celtic Britons and Scots and Irish and the Germanic Saxons, Angles, Norse and Normans. Growing up the descendant mainly of Germans and Puritan WASPs in an Irish and Italian Catholic milieu, I noticed early on that there existed a natural animosity wherever the Saxon-Celt divide was perceptible. The Irish kids I grew up with seemed to define themselves in opposition to anything “whitebread” (Bo Sears, are you listening?).

Indeed, anybody whose people came here after 1860 tends to think of themselves as beyond responsibility for the race problem. That is, they don’t identify with the earlier American sense of the need to exercise control over alien and hostile populations. This is compounded by the fact that many of the post-1848 immigrants to America, the German socialists, the poor of Southern and Eastern Europe, were little more than serfs. They identified not so much with the blacks themselves – many had strong prejudices against them – but with their plight as menial workers at the bottom of society. What they really resented was the Anglo-Saxons who occupied the positions of power, wealth and influence in their new land. Siding with blacks was a way to get at the hated “bosses.” When World War I and II rolled around, this same impulse manifested itself as anti-German feeling. The Saxon type was seen to be doing the same thing to Europe as he was doing in America to blacks, Indians and immigrants. He would have to be dethroned. Jews lead the charge, but all non-WASP ethnics pile on heartily.

All of this eventually leads to the destruction of any notion of aristocracy beyond the money power. It’s been over a hundred years now since the last pro-white American movement against the banks, the Populists, fizzled out, co-opted by the two major parties. The Age of Mass Man has settled in.Chilton Williamson Jr., writing in the September issue of Chronicles draws the grim portrait of our modern condition:

Deprived of an authoritative aristocracy to direct its government, uphold a coherent social structure, fight its wars, and maintain high standards in learning and in the arts, Western civilization has approached near collapse, as the enfranchised rude republican of the 19th century has devolved steadily into the “empowered” mass man of the 20th and 21st , to the point where, today, democratic society exists only in the anthropological sense. The devastation is systemic, endemic, and all-pervasive, embracing government and public life, the professions, the arts, manners, morals, and religion. Modern Americans no longer recognize or appreciate civilization. They have ceased to be able to govern themselves, and they have ceased to be capable of thought, in part because mass democracy encourages thinking about everything in the mass – abstractly and statistically, according to the standards set by the social “sciences.” The mass man, Ortega said, thinks he is perfect. That is as good an explanation as any for the secularization of modern society and of religion itself, as only people who are aware of their radical imperfection can be expected to believe in the Christian God and to observe His commandments.

That man should become standardized in his wants and needs, all material; that he should want nothing more than to live as only irresponsible aristocrats had once been able to live, in the illusion of vice, luxury and material comfort; to be self-sufficient with income from the increasingly abstract “work” of keeping the books for the transactions of the service economy, with his eye so close to one small facet of the scheme as to miss its whole import: this was the goal of the financiers and their industrialist confederates.

Feminism suits their ambitions perfectly, for it accomplishes several laudable goals. It expands the pool of both consumers and laborers; and it leads to a demographic crisis that drives mass immigration, allowing still more workers to be imported from alien countries, cultures and races. Anything that works against an ethnic national unity on the part of whites is essential to the scheme. Other races and types of men may be educated in an awareness of ethnic pride, because this can be used as a bludgeon against whites, who are increasingly shown to be the robbers of freedom of the downtrodden of the world. We must be ever vigilant against “racism” in order to prevent another KKK, another Hitler, another Wallace, indeed anyone or anything that would remind people that America was once a Protestant Christian country populated by predominantly Anglo-Saxon whites who did not want to amalgamate their country, their culture, their homes, businesses and families with Africans, Asiatics, Jews and Indians. And so the Civil Rights movement, organized, funded and propagandized by and for the interests of the money power and its international socialist wing and utterly pervasive at all levels of government, legal and academic bureaucracy, conducts an ongoing revolution designed to remake man to suit the demands of the new uniformity.

The moral cachet of the movement has been extended to the relations between the sexes and the interests of fathers within the family. The state declares that there shall be no gods before it: all allegiance to God and His created order shall hereby cease. Today’s soulless material man, propagandized under the new gods of Freud, Kinsey, Mead, Spock and Hefner, has embraced the Playboy Philosophy with relish. Sexual liberation for women, packaged in the Civil Rights wrappings, means that men can now enjoy sex without marriage.

Women, subsidized by government allotments and enabled by the cash and commodity economy, enjoy financial independence without men. Mass-market feminist magazines applaud women having sex and children without the restrictions of husbands, oppressive morals and social opprobrium. Birth control and abortion rights, no-fault divorce, custody laws and child support regimes mean that marriage and children pose too much of a financial risk for men, who can be threatened with expulsion from their families and the loss of half their income for almost any cause. For women, the risks of pinning their future and that of their children on a husband will be less attractive than delaying motherhood until an independent career can be established. Men and women will need each other only for sex and the satisfaction of their emotional needs while they pursue, almost separately even in cohabitation, their individual careers based on personal advancement and self-fulfillment.

This fragile basis for union will be strained fatally by precisely those human needs the new morality was calculated to liberate. The end result is atomized men and women hopelessly seeking satisfaction from the very things in life that are most sure to disappoint. The anxiety can be relieved only temporarily by the next round of spending on material pleasures: exactly the way the moguls want it. Your credit limit goes up as your moral condition goes down.

There seems to be no way to reclaim this culture. Anyone who wishes to escape infection must separate from it, criticize it to all who will listen, and strive to set against it an appealing and heroic counterexample. We must relentlessly campaign to weaken its basic assumptions. These notions in particular must be countered: that everybody’s equal, with material circumstances determining outcomes; that democracy is good and that everybody, everywhere in all times and places, wants it; and that material progress is the only measure of the health of a society.

At last, one by one, we must all “repent, turn to God and do works befitting repentance (Acts 26:20 NKJV).” For therein lies our hope and salvation.'

Is London's Future Islamic?

Time Out Magazine, had an interesting and slightly disturbing article back in June 2007 with the above title, the magazine is a 'whats on in London' type rag I remember well from my few years years there. It is a typical left wing establishment publication, and as such takes for granted all of the left wing victories of the past century as the norm.

I found this article recently and was almost gaging as I read the sickly Islamophile propaganda that was so blatant, one could mistake it for a parody of what left wingers regularly write.

Apparently Time Out think Islam would be great because of the public health benefits! Such as washing feet and hands on a daily basis! I was under the impression most people had a bath or shower on a daily basis? Perhaps the men and women at Time Out don't?

The next point they make it that Islam is more ecologically friendly then Londoners presently are! I think that is a sop to the greenies!

The next point they make is that Muslims do better at school, this is probably correct, as Muslim families have structure, fathers and stay at home mothers to make sure they don' go off the rails, unlike most white children in London.

They then go on to say that religious minorities would be better off due to the Dhimma!

In fact the writer seems to think that an Islamic London would be a left wingers dream come true!

Well, my amazement at such naivete never seems to prepare of the next load of non-sense, spoken or written by people who know little or nothing about the realities of Islam, and the reality of living as a minority of some sort under the religious rule of Islamic fanatics!

It seems strange that writers, such as the one writing for Time Out, would actually wish this upon themselves, it is they who would be the first to suffer. It is all that they hold dear that would be destroyed, something I could quite readily stand aside for!

Although I could happily stand aside and watch the fury of this coming Islamic storm sweep away all that the secularists, atheists, communists, feminists and other assorted lefties have achieved in the past century, I also realise that this would only be a temporary reprieve from the storm myself, as once they have done away with the most obvious insults to their god, they would turn on us, the ones who believe in the real God, we would have persecution like we have never known, persecution of the type the Copts, Chaldeans, Assyrians, Armenians and Greeks experienced to today! No doubt the godless would readily embrace Islam as a way to avoid any trouble, taking delight in our own travails, perhaps even joining in!

Islam is not only growing in London, it grows in Ireland, in Dublin and Cork, more and more arrive, we must ask ourselves, are we ready to ditch all that we were? Are we ready to become something else, just because we can't be bothered doing anything about it?

I'm afraid the answer is an apathetic 'whatever'.

Link

A Cold Wind is Blowing!

It looks as if the financial chickens are coming home to roost! A bank run in the UK all but bankrupted Northern Rock a few months ago, something which the socialist government there seems unable to comprehend, they seem to think government has the power to dictate how economies go! But most governments assume this, that's why they say things like 'this government has created 3 million new jobs'.

No you didn't, businessmen and entrepreneurs did, in spite of you!

Now the American banking sector looks like it is on the precipice of collapse, the like we have not seen for seventy years. Bear Stearns is bankrupt, although they don't say that, they say it is 'being rescued', but the reality is the recklessness and greed of the nineties and the noughties will have to be repaid, whether we like it or not.

Now there are rumours circulating about Citigroup and Lehman Brothers and their viability. This is fine for the people involved, as they will just get a payout and go into early retirement, for the rest of us it means some very leans years ahead at best.

You see, when greedy men, in concert with greedy and dishonest politicians decide to defraud the people, there is nothing we can do to stop it, they will tell us everything is fine, that there is no reason to be fearful, indeed they will involve us in the fraud, as long as they get the lion's share of the reward and are exposed to little of the consequences of the crime.

The government gets its share by taxing the fraudulent exchanges, and debasing the currency, have you ever wondered why your Euro or Pound or Dollar is worth less then it was ten years ago? Well, its because they create new money and give it to the financiers in the City of London, Frankfurt and New York, once they have spent it, your money loses its value meaning your Euro is now only worth the equivalent of ninety cents before the government debased it.

This goes on year after year, taxes go up to keep up with this slow motion devaluation and we, the normal people, are squeezed, whilst the government and financiers get wealthy on our backs.

I used to wonder why God forbade his people to charge interest on loans or got involved in what I thought were little things like scales and measurements, I think I understand now, I see the sin that these financiers get into, the greed that this fraud called 'International Finance' creates in people, the lies, deceit and theft we all become entangled in.

I recall talking to my parents and grandparents about money when they were young, in fact my grandmother gave me some old coins, some going back to the 1885, bearing the portrait of Queen Victoria, some had the face of Edward VII on them, and these coins were still in circulation in Ireland in the seventies!

It means that the currency had not been debased in such a reckless and debauched way, it meant that a penny issued in 1885 was still being used to buy things in 1973! That is unbelievable to me, as I have seen two currencies in circulation, and various notes and coins which long ago became useless.

Surely there is something wrong when the Pound, Shillings and Pence we used to use, managed to retained their value for centuries seeing small and insignificant inflation, to what we see now when the successor to the Pounds, Shillings and Pence is now all but worthless?

If a man from the time of James I, spoke to a man from the time of Victoria about money, they would broadly understand each other, if any had the misfortune to talk to a man of today, they would be unable to understand how a pound is now worthless! This is the work of the greedy and dishonest men who inhabit governments all about the world, the habit of inflation, of debauching of the currencies.

The fairy tale world of 'International Finance' is coming to a close, unfortunately for us, it is we, who will feel the cold wind of recession, not the ones responsible!

Links: Swiss America

Urban Survival

Asian times

Daily Telegraph

Revolutions

Revolutions have this odd hold on our minds, they are romanticised in film and novel, their instigators proclaim they fight for 'freedom', or 'liberty' or 'independence'!

The reality is that violence, bloodshed and unlimited greed are the results! Those United States did not begin their existence in some sort of nirvana in 1776, a small group of heavily indebted, petty aristocrats decided to use the issue of the 'Intolerable Acts' as an excuse to rebel against their rightful King, they exaggerated the weight of the taxes that amounted to less then 1% of the GDP of the colonies, they whipped up anti-Catholic bigotry when they refereed to the decent treatment of the French colonists in Quebec by the Crown. They whipped up more bigotry and genocidal zeal when they objected to the the Proclamation line which had been set, so as to protect the Indians from unorganised and unlawful land grabs!

Fully one third of the population supported the Crown, they were expelled, massacred, harassed, robbed, humiliated and 'cleansed' from certain areas, the rebel minority managed to tough out the long drawn out war and only achieved their independence as a result of French and Spanish intervention on their side.

In the aftermath of American Independence in 1783, loyalists to the Crown were systematically excluded from the 'new order', tens of thousands left for Canada or other parts of the Empire, in the early years of the new republic, they did not do this as some sort of 'lifestyle change', they did this because of fears for their lives or property!

The new republic then went and started to tax their people heavier then the Crown had ever tired to! They mercilessly put down the Whiskey rebellion, how ironic is that, some treasonous rebels put down some other rebels because they rebel against the rebels!

This new republic then applies the same murderous policy it had to 'Tories' to the Indians and begins to appropriate their lands, exterminate it's people and ethnically cleanse the lands east of the Mississippi.

It is not a coincidence that the Indians fought with the British in the war of 1812!

The French Revolution began peacefully, when the States General, proclaimed itself the National Assembly, but the evil and power hungry men of the Jacobins and the Girondistes wanted more, they wanted more power, they were not satisfied with reform, they wanted revolution, and that is what they got!

When they murdered their King, Louis XVI, they unleashed a storm that would not only end the lives of millions, they unleashed something that can only be described as satanic into the world, this appetite for bloody revolution, this template, this inspiration to evil and wicked men who desire power over all things!

The Terror, is aptly named, it haunts us to this day! The direct result of this revolution was Napoleon and his unbridled lust for domination, which led to the devastation of the wars that continued up to 1815.

The French Revolution inspired the ideologies of hate and envy that were eventually distilled by Karl Marx in his Communist Manifesto and Das Kapital, inspired by this atheistic utopianism, the Bolsheviks took advantage of the disaster that was the Great War and overthrew the Russian government, they were not content with power alone, they wanted to meld the minds of all their newly acquired subjects, the deposed Czar with his family posed a threat to the ligitimacy of their new government and it's own Terror.

The Imperial family were murdered, what followed was hell on earth for Russia and it's people for nigh on 80 long miserable, terrifying years!

The Russian example gave rise to Hitler and Mao and Pol Pot! All of them inspired by the communist take over, all inspired by the Jacobins and the Bolsheviks! All inspired in part by the Rebels in America!

Revolution is an evil, wicked thing, planned and executed by atheistic, God haters. People who worship man above all things, those who lack humility or decency or even simple human kindness. Loyalty, duty, sacrifice, this is what the opponents of these revolutions displayed, this is their reward as they are now mostly forgotten.

The loyal subject of King George, who lost all his property, who was tarred and feathered, beaten in front of his family!

The loyal subject of King Louis, Who was hunted down in the forests of the Vendee, who was tortured and murdered, who's family was scattered and lost!

the loyal subject of Czar Nicholas, who was brutalised and butchered, his family left to starve, and if he had any descendants, they would have lived in fear for generations!

these are the people who suffer at the hands of these pompous, overfed, over important, ignorant, evil men, who declare with such arrogance that they represent the people that they harm!

It is not these evil men who represent the peasants and the lowly, it is the King, Le Roi, the Czar who represent these men and are the only ones capable of doing so!

Revolutions are evil, tens of millions, perhaps even hundreds of millions have lost their lives for the ambitions of republicans!

Yet nothing can change the reality that we are still enchanted by the Kings of old, republics are grey and lifeless, they speak to our heads not our hearts, only a King can speak to both!

Toryism and modernity

Wikipedia states:

'The word comes from the Middle Irish word tóraidhe, modern Irish tóraí — outlaw, robber, from the Irish word tóir, meaning 'pursuit', since outlaws were "pursued men"

Originally the word 'Tory' was a term of insult, as was the word 'Whig', as is often the case, the insult was adopted by those it was supposed to insult and worn as a badge of pride.

Just to impress this point on you, I am not a member of the British Conservative Party, I do not support them nor any other party, I describe myself as a Tory in the old sense of the word!

I like the original meaning of the word, it seems apt to me, as I feel as if I'm an outlaw or a pursued man with the beliefs I hold. I despise democracy and all the feel good propaganda that goes with it, I despise those politicians who seem such little men compared with those from even a century ago, I despise their smallness, their ignorance and their pandering to the basest instincts.

I despise their attitude toward our culture, history and faith, they obviously hold them in contempt, as they banish Christianity from the school rooms, or even worse, make a mockery of it. They hold homosexuality and those who practice it in the sort of regard we used to hold the saints!

Women are led to believe that the highest goal in life is to get a job, and that there is nothing wrong with acting like a slut, because hey, men have been doing it for so long, why can't we?

Then they wonder why they can't get married, and before they know it, they are 35 years old, single, overweight and childless!

Our modern world is so full of lies, and we believe those lies, we live by these lies and as we see, people die by those lies!

The old truths of faith, family, honour, decency, loyalty, duty and sacrifice are now ridiculed, they are laughed at, as cynicism, selfishness, promiscuity, sloth and greed are elevated to new heights, this is the new morality.

These lies promise to liberate us, indeed, we are assailed every day by advertisements, songs, political propaganda and other trash telling us to 'just do it', to ignore morality and do 'what feels good to us', to dismiss honour and decency and duty for a one night stand.

How pathetic is our rotten culture? How sad are those who live by this new morality?

I would rather be an outlaw, a bandit a Tory!!